From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2004-10-10T02:14:18+09:00
Subject: Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics)

On Oct 9, 2004, at 7:07 AM, Brian Candler wrote:

> I agree with Matz - Range#member? is not very useful. For the 
> occasional
> case where you might need such semantics, it's easy enough to code up 
> your
> own object which behaves how you want.

Or just use:

(3..5).to_a.include?(4)

James Edward Gray II