[#114484] Secret Santas (#2) — Ruby Quiz <james@...>

The three rules of Ruby Quiz:

56 messages 2004/10/01
[#114675] Secret Santas (#2) — Robo <robo@...> 2004/10/03

I'm still new to Ruby, but giving this a crack anyway.

[#114496] Community size — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

15 messages 2004/10/01

[#114646] Kernel#eval taking a block — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>

Is there a reason Kernel#eval won't take a block? I wrote this to overcome:

14 messages 2004/10/03
[#114729] Re: Kernel#eval taking a block — nobu.nokada@... 2004/10/04

Hi,

[#114654] Feature Request: Truly Indented Here-Docs — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Ruby's here-doc syntax baffles me. I don't get the indent the end tag

11 messages 2004/10/03

[#114708] Thinking about Threaded IO — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

I've not used Ruby's threads before, so I have what will probably be

13 messages 2004/10/03

[#114824] A ruby course — Brian Schrer <ruby@...>

Hello List,

42 messages 2004/10/04
[#115001] Re: A ruby course — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/10/05

On Tuesday, October 5, 2004, 3:17:47 AM, Brian wrote:

[#115042] Re: A ruby course — Brian Schrer <ruby@...> 2004/10/05

Hello Group,

[#114890] New [] Semantics — Bill Atkins <batkins57@...>

Currently, the following code

97 messages 2004/10/04
[#114910] Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/10/05

Bill Atkins wrote:

[#114925] Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/05

On Monday 04 October 2004 09:09 pm, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#114938] Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/05

The ideas I'm (slowly) playing with for ranges:

[#114959] Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/05

On Tuesday 05 October 2004 01:25 am, Markus wrote:

[#115120] Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/06

Hi,

[#115128] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/06

On Tuesday 05 October 2004 08:19 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#115159] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/10/06

On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:18:50AM +0900, trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#115196] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/06

On Wednesday 06 October 2004 05:15 am, Brian Candler wrote:

[#115345] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2004/10/07

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#115404] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/07

matz wrote:

[#115413] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/10/07

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:11:11PM +0900, trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#115424] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/07

Brian, you make some excellent points, and clarify the issues. Thanks.

[#115514] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/08

Hi,

[#115527] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/08

On Thursday 07 October 2004 08:08 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#115543] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/08

Hi,

[#115553] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/08

On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:42 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#115569] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/08

Hi,

[#115626] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/08

On Friday 08 October 2004 04:31 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#115800] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/09

Hi,

[#115802] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "Randy W. Sims" <ml-ruby@...> 2004/10/09

On 10/9/2004 4:28 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#115807] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/09

Hi,

[#115809] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "Randy W. Sims" <ml-ruby@...> 2004/10/09

On 10/9/2004 5:08 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#115811] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/09

Hi,

[#115814] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — "Randy W. Sims" <ml-ruby@...> 2004/10/09

On 10/9/2004 5:33 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#115817] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...> 2004/10/09

Randy W. Sims ha scritto:

[#115820] Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/10/09

On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 08:14:42PM +0900, gabriele renzi wrote:

[#114892] RubyGems and RPA — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Having just read the RubyGems chapter in the Pickaxe II, I'm curious

31 messages 2004/10/04
[#114895] Re: RubyGems and RPA — Bill Atkins <batkins57@...> 2004/10/04

RPA and RubyGems both solve the same problem (automatic installation

[#114977] Re: RubyGems and RPA — Eivind Eklund <eeklund@...> 2004/10/05

Association disclaimer: I'm the original architect of the RPA vision

[#115194] Re: RubyGems and RPA — Chad Fowler <chadfowler@...> 2004/10/06

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 20:09:10 +0900, Eivind Eklund <eeklund@gmail.com> wrote:

[#115224] Re: RubyGems and RPA — Eivind Eklund <eeklund@...> 2004/10/06

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:48:07 +0900, Chad Fowler <chadfowler@gmail.com> wrote:

[#115251] Re: RubyGems and RPA — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2004/10/06

[#115260] Re: RubyGems and RPA — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/10/06

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:00:45 +0900, Richard Kilmer <rich@infoether.com> wrote:

[#114924] Regexp match question on interpolated strings... — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>

If I had the source for a string:

13 messages 2004/10/05

[#114927] Ruby-esque Inversion of Control — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...>

First, let me just say THANK-YOU to everyone who gave me feedback on my

13 messages 2004/10/05
[#115046] Re: Ruby-esque Inversion of Control — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2004/10/05

I still don't think that Copland is in any way useful to me (I just

[#115095] Large disc-based "hash"? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/10/05

[#115195] quality of error messages — Joachim Wuttke <Joachim_Wuttke@...>

Hi Ruby developers,

101 messages 2004/10/06
[#115200] Re: quality of error messages — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/10/06

On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:48:49PM +0900, Joachim Wuttke wrote:

[#115207] Re: quality of error messages — Joachim Wuttke <Joachim_Wuttke@...> 2004/10/06

Encouraged by your quick response, I try to explain better

[#115212] Re: quality of error messages — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/10/06

On Thursday, October 7, 2004, 12:49:33 AM, Joachim wrote:

[#115264] Re: quality of error messages — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2004/10/06

Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#115268] Re: quality of error messages — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/10/06

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:30:38AM +0900, Charles Hixson wrote:

[#115286] Re: quality of error messages — Joachim Wuttke <Joachim_Wuttke@...> 2004/10/06

Thank you, Brian.

[#115289] Re: quality of error messages — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/06

On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 15:19, Joachim Wuttke wrote:

[#115460] Re: quality of error messages — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2004/10/07

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 07:39:04 +0900, Markus <markus@reality.com> wrote:

[#115484] Re: quality of error messages — Brian Schrer <ruby@...> 2004/10/07

Mark Hubbart wrote:

[#115511] Re: quality of error messages — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/07

Hi,

[#115596] Re: quality of error messages — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/10/08

On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 08:06:27AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#116200] Re: quality of error messages — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/10/11

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 20:26:55 +0900, Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> wrote:

[#116211] Re: quality of error messages — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/12

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#116215] Ruby Directions (was Re: quality of error messages) — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/10/12

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:21:16 +0900, Hal Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> wrote:

[#116216] Re: Ruby Directions (was Re: quality of error messages) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/10/12

Hi --

[#116256] Re: Ruby Directions (was Re: quality of error messages) — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/10/12

[#116299] Re: Ruby Directions (was Re: quality of error messages) — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/10/12

On Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 5:09:37 PM, Robert wrote:

[#115493] Re: quality of error messages — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/10/07

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 07:39:04 +0900, Markus <markus@reality.com> wrote:

[#115513] Re: quality of error messages — markus@... 2004/10/07

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#115285] Bit of the Matz Interview (in Rubyist Magazine) — <ume@...>

I haven't translated it all yet (it's quite long to translate, and I'm just

38 messages 2004/10/06
[#115293] Re: Bit of the Matz Interview (in Rubyist Magazine) — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/06

ume@lightsider.com wrote:

[#115299] Re: Bit of the Matz Interview (in Rubyist Magazine) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/06

Hi,

[#115301] Re: Bit of the Matz Interview (in Rubyist Magazine) — Chad Fowler <chadfowler@...> 2004/10/06

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:27:08 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto

[#115360] ndb Object-Relational Mapper — "George Moschovitis" <george.moschovitis@...>

= n/db README

25 messages 2004/10/07
[#115368] Re: [ANN] ndb Object-Relational Mapper — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/10/07

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 08:14:53PM +0900, George Moschovitis wrote:

[#115407] Re: [ANN] ndb Object-Relational Mapper — "Kirk Haines" <khaines@...> 2004/10/07

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:20:37 +0900, Brian Candler wrote

[#115430] Re: [ANN] ndb Object-Relational Mapper — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/10/07

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:31:37PM +0900, Kirk Haines wrote:

[#115583] Re: [ANN] ndb Object-Relational Mapper — George Moschovitis <gm@...> 2004/10/08

> I wrote a system once which incorporated this concept, but since it had a

[#115427] Sth. wrong with File.file? (or with me) — Michael Weller <michael@...>

Hi!

114 messages 2004/10/07
[#115435] Re: Sth. wrong with File.file? (or with me) — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/10/07

On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 12:30, Michael Weller wrote:

[#118265] true? & false? — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/10/29

Wouldn't it be nice to have two more methods true? and false? like nil?

[#118266] Re: true? & false? — Bill Atkins <batkins57@...> 2004/10/29

Why would that be nice? :)

[#118268] Re: true? & false? — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/10/29

I prefer something like,

[#118270] Re: true? & false? — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2004/10/29

On Oct 29, 2004, at 10:16 AM, Mohammad Khan wrote:

[#118276] Re: true? & false? — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/10/29

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 11:22, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#118294] Re: true? & false? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/10/29

On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:47:31 +0900, Mohammad Khan <mkhan@lextranet.com> wrote:

[#118295] Re: true? & false? — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/10/29

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 13:43, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#118298] Another scrach on head — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/10/29

[#118299] Re: Another scrach on head — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/29

Mohammad Khan wrote:

[#118304] Re: Another scrach on head — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/10/29

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 14:05, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#118306] Re: Another scrach on head — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/10/29

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 14:16, Mohammad Khan wrote:

[#118308] Re: Another scrach on head — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/29

Mohammad Khan wrote:

[#118345] Re: Another scrach on head — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/30

Hi,

[#118596] Re: Another scrach on head — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/11/01

On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 00:03, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#118598] Re: Another scrach on head — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/01

Hi --

[#118602] Re: Another scrach on head — Ara.T.Howard@... 2004/11/01

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, David A. Black wrote:

[#118627] Re: Another scrach on head — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2004/11/01

[#118629] Re: Another scrach on head — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/11/01

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 05:47:18 +0900, Jim Weirich <jim@weirichhouse.org> wrote:

[#119859] Re: true? & false? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/11/11

[#119879] Re: true? & false? — Mohammad Khan <mkhan@...> 2004/11/11

The main reason I brought up this issue is:

[#119938] Re: true? & false? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/11/11

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 00:28:35 +0900, Mohammad Khan

[#119888] Re: true? & false? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/11/11

[#119917] Re: true? & false? — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...> 2004/11/11

Hi there,

[#119937] Re: true? & false? — Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@...> 2004/11/11

Well I have written true? and false? methods in the past. Forgetting

[#119939] Re: true? & false? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/11/11

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:47:27 +0900, Logan Capaldo

[#115455] RubyConf 2004 sessions available (audio/mp3) — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>

All,

24 messages 2004/10/07
[#115572] Re: [ANN] RubyConf 2004 sessions available (audio/mp3) — Mathieu Blondel <matt@...> 2004/10/08

[#115457] dev-utils v1.0 — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Hi all,

15 messages 2004/10/07

[#115544] Re: quality of error messages — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org] wrote:

16 messages 2004/10/08
[#115545] Re: quality of error messages — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/08

Hi,

[#115546] Re: quality of error messages — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#115551] Re: quality of error messages — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/08

Hi,

[#115586] rails vs Java Struts — Armin Roehrl <armin@...>

Hi,

26 messages 2004/10/08

[#115614] Geodesic Dome Faces (#3) — Ruby Quiz <james@...>

The three rules of Ruby Quiz:

31 messages 2004/10/08

[#115652] Problems with my first multithreaded Rupy programm — "Tassilo Horn" <heimdall@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2004/10/08

[#115684] ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...>

All --

102 messages 2004/10/08
[#115698] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...> 2004/10/08

Markus ha scritto:

[#115699] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/08

gabriele renzi wrote:

[#115705] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/08

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:54, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#115713] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/08

Markus wrote:

[#115719] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/08

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 12:43, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#115726] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/08

Markus wrote:

[#115830] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/10/09

Hi --

[#115796] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...> 2004/10/09

Markus ha scritto:

[#115872] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2004/10/09

gabriele renzi wrote:

[#115955] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2004/10/10

On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:19:30AM +0900, Charles Hixson wrote:

[#115971] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/10

On Sunday 10 October 2004 05:48 am, Brian Candler wrote:

[#115988] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/10

On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 02:48, Brian Candler wrote:

[#116087] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/11

Hi,

[#115702] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/08

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:44, gabriele renzi wrote:

[#115704] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — "Jason Voegele" <jason@...> 2004/10/08

Markus said:

[#115728] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2004/10/08

Jason Voegele wrote:

[#115752] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2004/10/08

[#115774] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/09

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 15:39, Jim Weirich wrote:

[#115707] TempFile — Matt Maycock <ummaycoc@...>

[ummaycoc@localhost ummaycoc]$ ruby -v

18 messages 2004/10/08
[#115771] Re: TempFile — Ara.T.Howard@... 2004/10/09

On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Matt Maycock wrote:

[#115881] Re: TempFile — Matt Maycock <ummaycoc@...> 2004/10/09

Nope :-(

[#115787] Definitive method for managing ruby installations — Carl Youngblood <carl.youngblood@...>

It seems like most ruby programmers build and install ruby from

13 messages 2004/10/09

[#115806] Re: Ruby is a slow performer — gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...>

Sergei Gnezdov ha scritto:

20 messages 2004/10/09
[#119298] Re: Ruby is a slow performer — Christian Szegedy <szegedy@...> 2004/11/05

gabriele renzi wrote:

[#119302] Re: Ruby is a slow performer — "David G. Andersen" <dga@...> 2004/11/05

On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 06:23:41AM +0900, Christian Szegedy scribed:

[#119366] Re: Ruby is a slow performer — Christian Szegedy <szegedy@...> 2004/11/06

David G. Andersen wrote:

[#115856] Hypergraph? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

I've looked a little at Hypergraph (http://hypergraph.sourceforge.net) and I

26 messages 2004/10/09
[#115899] Re: Hypergraph? — Kaspar Schiess <eule@...> 2004/10/09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#115885] Ruby VM Projects — "Mark Wassell" <mwassel@...>

There are a number of RubyVM machine projects some just starting, some

23 messages 2004/10/09

[#115954] DI service change notifications (Syringe) — leon breedt <bitserf@...>

hi,

14 messages 2004/10/10

[#116007] Putting some code out to DRY — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>

13 messages 2004/10/10

[#116039] Ruby programming styles and new program? — Bill <bi11@...>

Hello,

17 messages 2004/10/11
[#116092] Re: Ruby programming styles and new program? — Eivind Eklund <eeklund@...> 2004/10/11

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:04:40 +0900, Bill <bi11@lynxview.com> wrote:

[#116096] case based on object class — George Moschovitis <gm@...>

Hello everyone,

14 messages 2004/10/11
[#116098] Re: [Q] case based on object class — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/11

George Moschovitis wrote:

[#116226] documentation as source — "Randy W. Sims" <ml-ruby@...>

Are there any Ruby modules that allow documentation to act as source

59 messages 2004/10/12
[#116281] Re: documentation as source — Bil Kleb <Bil.Kleb@...> 2004/10/12

Randy W. Sims wrote:

[#116284] Re: documentation as source — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2004/10/12

Bil Kleb wrote:

[#116566] Re: documentation as source — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/10/14

On Oct 12, 2004, at 07:39, Florian Gross wrote:

[#116693] Re: documentation as source — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/15

On Wednesday 13 October 2004 09:19 pm, Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#116983] Re: documentation as source — Massimiliano Mirra - bard <mmirra@...> 2004/10/18

Eivind Eklund <eeklund@gmail.com> writes:

[#117022] Re: documentation as source — Eivind Eklund <eeklund@...> 2004/10/19

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:09:22 +0900, Massimiliano Mirra - bard

[#117025] Re: documentation as source — Bil Kleb <Bil.Kleb@...> 2004/10/19

Eivind Eklund wrote:

[#117026] Re: documentation as source — Eivind Eklund <eeklund@...> 2004/10/19

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:33:57 +0900, Bil Kleb <bil.kleb@nasa.gov> wrote:

[#117029] Re: documentation as source — Peter Hickman <peter@...> 2004/10/19

Eivind Eklund wrote:

[#117033] Re: documentation as source — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/10/19

On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 11:08:35PM +0900, Peter Hickman wrote:

[#116271] "nan".to_f ? — Thomas Fini Hansen <beast@...>

I ran into this difference:

29 messages 2004/10/12
[#116276] Re: "nan".to_f ? — Stephan K舂per <Stephan.Kaemper@...> 2004/10/12

Hi Thomas, hi Rubyists

[#116340] Re: "nan".to_f ? — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/12

[#116343] Re: "nan".to_f ? — Mikael Brockman <mikael@...> 2004/10/12

Markus <markus@reality.com> writes:

[#116354] Re: "nan".to_f ? — Stephan K舂per <Stephan.Kaemper@...> 2004/10/12

Mikael Brockman wrote:

[#116318] dev-utils v1.0.1 — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Hi folks,

13 messages 2004/10/12

[#116408] eRuby for Windows — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...>

I have a situation where I need to create/write static web pages using

15 messages 2004/10/13

[#116474] Gems Install Problem — jim@...

Hi

14 messages 2004/10/13

[#116478] Sharing variables across methods — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>

When writing short scripts (several pages long) I often want to share

17 messages 2004/10/13
[#116484] Re: Sharing variables across methods — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/13

David Garamond wrote:

[#116546] using the RSS standard lib — Francis Hwang <sera@...>

Is anybody out there using the RSS standard lib that comes with Ruby

22 messages 2004/10/13
[#116552] Re: using the RSS standard lib — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2004/10/13

* Francis Hwang <sera@fhwang.net> [Oct 13, 2004 23:10]:

[#116608] To all people writing BBS on Rails: let's join forces — Alexey Verkhovsky <alex@...>

I've noticed lately that there are at least four different projects

22 messages 2004/10/14

[#116615] Rounding to X digits — Eric Anderson <eric@...>

This seems like such a basic question yet I can't really find the answer

26 messages 2004/10/14
[#116662] Re: Rounding to X digits — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/14

Here's mine (with a few extras):

[#116739] Re: Rounding to X digits — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/15

On Thursday 14 October 2004 01:55 pm, Markus wrote:

[#116652] Eating sandwiches in the park — Markus <markus@...>

30 messages 2004/10/14
[#116657] Re: Eating sandwiches in the park — Eivind Eklund <eeklund@...> 2004/10/14

On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 02:13:35 +0900, Markus <markus@reality.com> wrote:

[#116661] Re: Eating sandwiches in the park — Brian Wisti <brianwisti@...> 2004/10/14

[#116701] drb, Session::Bash & FreeBSD — benny <listen@...>

Dear list,

17 messages 2004/10/15

[#116707] Can one simulate go to in Ruby? Is it possible? — Roman K9 <litleguy@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2004/10/15

[#116721] Again some problem with my multithreaded teadrinker app — "Tassilo Horn" <heimdall@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2004/10/15

[#117127] A concise description of Ruby? — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...>

Yesterday, a co-worker came into my office and saw the shiny, new pickaxe II

91 messages 2004/10/20
[#117150] Re: A concise description of Ruby? — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2004/10/20

On Oct 20, 2004, at 7:47 AM, Curt Hibbs wrote:

[#117161] Re: A concise description of Ruby? — James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...> 2004/10/20

I like most of the suggestions so far.

[#117192] Re: A concise description of Ruby? — Edgardo Hames <ehames@...> 2004/10/20

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:59:50 +0900, James Britt

[#117199] Re: A concise description of Ruby? — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2004/10/20

Edgardo Hames wrote:

[#117200] Python vs. Ruby (Re: A concise description of Ruby?) — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/20

Curt Hibbs wrote:

[#117231] Re: Python vs. Ruby (Re: A concise description of Ruby?) — Eivind Eklund <eeklund@...> 2004/10/20

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 04:06:35 +0900, Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote:

[#117233] Re: Python vs. Ruby (Re: A concise description of Ruby?) — gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...> 2004/10/20

Eivind Eklund ha scritto:

[#117165] Re: A concise description of Ruby? — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/10/20

On Wednesday 20 October 2004 14:47, Curt Hibbs wrote:

[#117166] Re: A concise description of Ruby? — James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...> 2004/10/20

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#117170] Re: A concise description of Ruby? — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2004/10/20

James Britt wrote:

[#117273] CamelCase issues — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

30 messages 2004/10/21

[#117331] A little help on finding the closest match — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>

Better way to find the closest match?

14 messages 2004/10/22

[#117459] RubyForge has been slow today because... — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>

Some freaking dork at the following IP address(s) was continually

76 messages 2004/10/24
[#117463] Garden Spam (was: RubyForge has been slow today because...) — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/24

Speaking of attacks, I jumped over to the Garden Wiki just now and see that

[#117464] Re: Garden Spam — David Ross <dross@...> 2004/10/24

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#117474] Re: Garden Spam — gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...> 2004/10/24

David Ross ha scritto:

[#117485] Re: Garden Spam — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/24

On Sunday 24 October 2004 06:29 am, gabriele renzi wrote:

[#117495] Re: Garden Spam — David Ross <dross@...> 2004/10/24

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#117509] Re: Garden Spam — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/24

On Sunday 24 October 2004 10:52 am, David Ross wrote:

[#117517] Re: Garden Spam — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/24

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#117586] Re: Garden Spam — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/10/25

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:24:51 +0900, Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote:

[#117588] Re: Garden Spam — Joey Gibson <joey@...> 2004/10/25

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#117591] Re: Garden Spam — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/25

Joey Gibson wrote:

[#117595] Re: Garden Spam — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/25

On Monday 25 October 2004 11:35 am, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#117483] String#first / String#last — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...>

problem:

30 messages 2004/10/24
[#117538] Re: [rcr] String#first / String#last — djberg96@... (Daniel Berger) 2004/10/24

Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@adslhome.dk> wrote in message news:<200410241718.48182.neoneye@adslhome.dk>...

[#117543] Re: [rcr] String#first / String#last — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/25

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#117557] Re: [rcr] String#first / String#last — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/25

Hi,

[#117540] Writing documentation in YAML - any advice? — "Its Me" <itsme213@...>

It will be a decent sized document. WinXP platform.

15 messages 2004/10/24

[#117598] Server Programming — Andy Stone <xsltguru@...>

Hello all,

20 messages 2004/10/25
[#117676] Re: Server Programming — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2004/10/25

Hi Andy,

[#117685] Re: Server Programming — Andy Stone <xsltguru@...> 2004/10/26

Hello Francis,

[#117689] Re: Server Programming — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/10/26

Andy Stone wrote:

[#117675] Errors in line numbers reported? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

Has anyone ever seen Ruby report incorrect line numbers

37 messages 2004/10/25
[#117696] Re: Errors in line numbers reported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/26

Hi,

[#117698] Re: Errors in line numbers reported? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/26

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#117778] Re: Errors in line numbers reported? — nobu.nokada@... 2004/10/26

Hi,

[#117699] Re: Errors in line numbers reported? — Ara.T.Howard@... 2004/10/26

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#117705] Re: Errors in line numbers reported? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/26

Hi,

[#117712] Re: Errors in line numbers reported? — Ara.T.Howard@... 2004/10/26

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#117721] Re: Errors in line numbers reported? — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/26

On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 20:54, Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#117731] Re: Errors in line numbers reported? — ts <decoux@...> 2004/10/26

>>>>> "M" == Markus <markus@reality.com> writes:

[#117811] New RCRchive is open — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Dear Rubyists --

14 messages 2004/10/26

[#117836] Auto-completion editor/IDE — "Eli Tucker" <eli-news@...>

Does anyone have any info on an IDE or editor that supports

17 messages 2004/10/26

[#117839] New RubyGarden article: "Reflections on Rails" — Chad Fowler <chadfowler@...>

Rubyists,

10 messages 2004/10/27

[#117854] Name Dropping — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...>

I'm in the final leg of preparing for a presentation I'm giving on Friday to

18 messages 2004/10/27

[#117929] The real Ruby vs. Python. — Abe Vionas_MailingList <mailinglist_abe@...>

What it comes down to is what it's coming down to for

71 messages 2004/10/27
[#117937] Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2004/10/27

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:11:19PM +0900, Abe Vionas_MailingList wrote:

[#117967] Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — "Its Me" <itsme213@...> 2004/10/27

[#118026] Re: Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — "Its Me" <itsme213@...> 2004/10/27

"Eivind Eklund" <eeklund@gmail.com> wrote in message

[#118046] Re: Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/10/27

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 05:49:02AM +0900, Its Me wrote:

[#118054] Re: Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/28

Then it sounds like that RubyGems needs to adopt the framework of RPA, and

[#118058] Re: Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — David Ross <dross@...> 2004/10/28

You can create your own packages with RPA as well. RPA doesnt have an

[#118073] Re: Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — Andreas Schwarz <usenet@...> 2004/10/28

David Ross wrote:

[#118097] Re: Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/10/28

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 01:44:00PM +0900, Andreas Schwarz wrote:

[#118098] Re: Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/10/28

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#118106] Re: Gems as key? Re: The real Ruby vs. Python. — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/10/28

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:08:08PM +0900, David A. Black wrote:

[#117982] Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com>

I can understand floating point errors, but this one seems too small

84 messages 2004/10/27
[#117984] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Walter Szewelanczyk <walter@...> 2004/10/27

Dan Janowski wrote:

[#117987] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Bill Atkins <batkins57@...> 2004/10/27

OK, that would make sense if v's value was 994.5, but it seems to be

[#117993] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/27

Bill Atkins wrote:

[#118005] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Jason DiCioccio <jd@...> 2004/10/27

Hello!

[#118006] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — "David G. Andersen" <dga@...> 2004/10/27

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 04:49:28AM +0900, Jason DiCioccio scribed:

[#118020] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/27

David G. Andersen wrote:

[#118053] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — markus@... 2004/10/28

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#118055] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/28

On Wednesday 27 October 2004 08:22 pm, markus@reality.com wrote:

[#118126] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/28

On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 17:40, trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#118215] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/29

On Thursday 28 October 2004 12:13 pm, Markus wrote:

[#118216] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/29

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#118341] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/30

On Friday 29 October 2004 03:00 am, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#118344] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/30

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#118349] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/30

On Saturday 30 October 2004 12:00 am, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#118019] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/27

Jason DiCioccio wrote:

[#118025] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/27

On Wednesday 27 October 2004 04:36 pm, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#118028] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/10/27

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#118029] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/10/27

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#118086] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2004/10/28

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:57:53 +0900, Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote:

[#118113] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com> 2004/10/28

I just want to thank all of you for a stimulating, interesting and, in

[#118125] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/10/28

On Thursday 28 October 2004 11:06 am, Dan Janowski wrote:

[#118132] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2004/10/28

On Oct 28, 2004, at 9:12 AM, trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#118141] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 * 9.95).to_i == 994 — Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...> 2004/10/28

On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 04:23, Mark Hubbart wrote:

[#118153] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 2000 2001 Desktop Money Projects Protege.png Protege_2.1 Q3.DIR Quicken RCS Screenshot-1.png Screenshot-2.png Screenshot-3.png Screenshot.png afs-backup afshome amixer.works b basic.edl bin bruin-woods c4isr.owl c4isr.pprj cellphones.sxc comedi comedilib config config-n6uni config.austin conv-factors.sxc debian drvinfo.txt dry.xml ds-tools emachines evolution float.sxc fnfix foomatic-db-current.tar.gz grp-backup iFog-Aqua20-1.tar.gz id_dsa.pub income jimo-core-sjenkins job-search ken-cole latex2docbook letters lfront log mbse modules n6uni-etc.tar.gz n6uni-home.tar.gz n6uni.tar.gz nasa nisotr old-ruby-tools openafs photos pickaxe2.pdf rdtmerge resume rexml.sxc ruby-bug ruby-oscon.sxi ruby-tidal ruby-tools smbmount.3.0.7 software themes tidal-3-11 tidal-3-5-patches tidal-cvsroot-archive tidal-data tidal-head tidal-poster-corrected.ppt tidal-poster.ppt tidal-web tidal-xdemo tidalsim.tar.gz uuid vim-ruby-snapshot-2003-10-12 wet.xml yepp 9.95).to_i == 994 — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2004/10/28

Guillaume Marcais wrote:

[#118169] Re: Rounding error, (100.0 2000 2001 Desktop Money Projects Protege.png Protege_2.1 Q3.DIR Quicken RCS Screenshot-1.png Screenshot-2.png Screenshot-3.png Screenshot.png afs-backup afshome amixer.works b basic.edl bin bruin-woods c4isr.owl c4isr.pprj cellphones.sxc comedi comedilib config config-n6uni config.austin conv-factors.sxc debian drvinfo.txt dry.xml ds-tools emachines evolution float.sxc fnfix foomatic-db-current.tar.gz grp-backup iFog-Aqua20-1.tar.gz id_dsa.pub income jimo-core-sjenkins job-search ken-cole latex2docbook letters lfront log mbse modules n6uni-etc.tar.gz n6uni-home.tar.gz n6uni.tar.gz nasa nisotr old-ruby-tools openafs photos pickaxe2.pdf rdtmerge resume rexml.sxc ruby-bug ruby-oscon.sxi ruby-tidal ruby-tools smbmount.3.0.7 software themes tidal-3-11 tidal-3-5-patches tidal-cvsroot-archive tidal-data tidal-head tidal-poster-corrected.ppt tidal-poster.ppt tidal-web tidal-xdemo tidalsim.tar.gz uuid vim-ruby-snapshot-2003-10-12 wet.xml yepp 9.95).to_i == 994 — Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...> 2004/10/28

On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 14:29, Steven Jenkins wrote:

[#118211] Thread::list and GC — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

15 messages 2004/10/29

[#118249] RubyGarden wiki patch — Chad Fowler <chadfowler@...>

FYI, I've just implemented this

33 messages 2004/10/29
[#118252] Re: RubyGarden wiki patch — David Ross <dross@...> 2004/10/29

Chad Fowler wrote:

[#118387] Re: RubyGarden wiki patch — Brian =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Schr=F6der?= <ruby@...> 2004/10/30

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:13:51 +0900

[#118388] Re: RubyGarden wiki patch — David Ross <dross@...> 2004/10/30

Brian Schrer wrote:

[#118392] Re: RubyGarden wiki patch — Mikael Brockman <mikael@...> 2004/10/30

David Ross <dross@code-exec.net> writes:

[#118395] Re: RubyGarden wiki patch — David Ross <dross@...> 2004/10/30

Mikael Brockman wrote:

[#118360] Ruby on Rails presentation added to the WhyRuby repository — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...>

I just added my presentation of Ruby on Rails to the WhyRuby repository.

13 messages 2004/10/30

[#118423] Flea vs RubyGarden — "Phlip" <phlip_cpp@...>

Rubistas:

15 messages 2004/10/30

[#118447] New Ruby conditional semantics thoughts — Brian Mitchell <binary42@...>

The basic background was begun by someone asking a question about

12 messages 2004/10/30

Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch

From: "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>
Date: 2004-10-09 16:50:41 UTC
List: ruby-talk #115847
On Saturday 09 October 2004 12:10 pm, Steven Jenkins wrote:
| I agree with Hal and David. Part of what appeals to me about Ruby (or
| any other language) is identity or integrity--in essence, having a Ruby
| Way.
|
| I don't complain about it, but I find the substantial volume of traffic
| on ruby-talk comparing Ruby to this or that language, or discussing how
| to make Ruby more like this or that, tiresome. I read ruby-talk to
| become more expressive and powerful in (this) Ruby, and I really don't
| care how it stacks up in a Consumer Reports-style feature comparison.
|
| I'm especially wary of extensions to syntax. I don't mind looking up
| semantics, but I want to handle syntax without help.

Well, such things are important. Good ideas rarely (if ever) just pop out of 
thin air. Netwon himself stood on shoulders. So its important that people 
talk about such things. It helps people learn why Ruby is the way it is and 
it helps Ruby improve, and some of us just plain enjoy it! ;)

Yet, I know some people, like yourself, feel this way about ruby-talk. So I 
have tried multiple times to get a separate mailing list invigorated for this 
very purpose. But none of the major players will back it, and as long as that 
is the case it just won't fly, and these discussions _will_ continue here. I 
can only assume that the Ruby community is just to small to support the 
division of lists.

So Ruby-talk remains the avenue for these explorations, which indeed tend to 
be long and detailed by their very nature.

Sorry,
T.


In This Thread