From: gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...>
Date: 2004-10-09T20:14:42+09:00
Subject: Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics)

Randy W. Sims ha scritto:

> Or better. Some classes could implement an optional method (a mixin 
> interface?), say find_in_range, so that if the method exists for the 
> type of objects in the range it is called for an efficient lookup. If 
> the object does not support the method, it can be done the old way using 
> obj#succ. 

isn't <=>+checking for same class enough for this?