From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-10-09T17:28:27+09:00
Subject: Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics)

Hi,

In message "Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics)"
    on Fri, 8 Oct 2004 22:43:52 +0900, "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@runbox.com> writes:

||   planA - leave member? and include? as they are; they are very easy
||           to distinguish, and to remember.  why bother?
||
||   planB - making member? as alias to include?; they behave same.  no
||           confusion, no problem.  who wants membership for ranges?

|Okay, planB is good. You are going the other way toward Range being 
|continuous.

OK.  I will consider taking planB in the future.  Would somebody
volunteer to update the RDoc in range.c if I change?

							matz.