From: gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...>
Date: 2004-10-09T17:09:42+09:00
Subject: Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch

Charles Hixson ha scritto:


> This is one place that I don't think Eiffel got things quite right.  
> Precedence should be defineable, not necessarily higher than all 
> built-in operators.  If one is defining a cross-product, e.g., one 
> doesn't necessarily want it to be of higher precedence than whatever one 
> is using to define the literal representation of the matrix.  And 
> ordinary arithmetic might be of even higher precedence.  E.G.:

yes, but this would be library interaction nightmare.