From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-10-08T13:19:56+09:00
Subject: Re: quality of error messages

Hi,

In message "Re: quality of error messages"
    on Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:58:26 +0900, Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> writes:

|> We can.  But how we check for missing/broken def/end pairs, more than
|> just syntax error?

|I believe what is being asked for is more than just a "syntax error" 
|message. If the error could be more specific, like "missing 'end' on 
|line x", it would greatly increase the usefulness of the -c option.

I know what he wants.  I am not refusing his idea.  The point is I'm
not yet sure how to detect missing pairs.

							matz.