From: gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...>
Date: 2004-10-08T03:04:51+09:00
Subject: Re: SWIG vs Ruby/DL

Phil Tomson ha scritto:
> 
> 
> Ruby/DL isn't as well documented, especially for dealing with C++ issues.  
> Isn't a shared lib produced from C++ problematic for Ruby/DL because of the 
> name mangling issues?

ahs sure, and the author highlighted that DL is for C not c++.