From: James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...>
Date: 2004-10-08T02:00:40+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby-esque Inversion of Control

Jim Weirich wrote:
> Charles O Nutter wrote:
> 
>> I forget who made this point at RubyConf, but the best example of why
>> IoC and Copland are good things is the idea of a Black Box.
> 
> 
> I've added my attempt at explaining DI/IoC at http://onestepback.org.  I 
> would be very interested in getting feedback on the effectiveness of the 
> article.

Early on, you refer to Dependency *Inversion*, rather than Inversion of 
Control or Dependency Injection (which is what I think you meant to say).



James