From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-10-07T08:13:44+09:00
Subject: Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics)

Hi,

In message "Re: Range behavior (Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics)"
    on Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:58:35 +0900, "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@runbox.com> writes:

|Not at all. This is something particular to a Range so why overload #include? 
|with that function? Doing so can cause duck-typing problems. To me member? 
|and include? are just different names for the same thing and should stay that 
|way.

Your opinion makes sense.  What do you thinks is the best way to fix?
Or maybe we first need to define the problem to fix to evaluate the fix.

							matz.