From: Bill Atkins <batkins57@...>
Date: 2004-10-05T10:15:10+09:00
Subject: Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:09:52 +0900, Charles Comstock <cc1@cec.wustl.edu> wrote:
> This makes perfect sense when the range is over numeric values, but to
> me ("a"..("c".succ)) is ugly and not easily read.  Or any other range of
> objects like that for that matter.

Good point.  I hadn't thought about that.  I just think the difference
between .. / ... is sort of confusing.

Bill Atkins