From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-10-05T08:37:10+09:00
Subject: Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics

Hi,

In message "Re: [RCR] New [] Semantics"
    on Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:24:23 +0900, Bill Atkins <batkins57@gmail.com> writes:

|I think the above [] behavior is more in keeping with POLS and is
|slightly more intuitive than the current default.
|
|Obviously this suggestion (and the sub-suggestion about .. and ...)
|would break existing code.  I don't know if RCR's are allowed to do
|that, but I'm just throwing this idea out there.

RCR's are allowed to break exisiting codes, but NOT ALLOWED to mention
POLS in them.  Being intuitive is a weak reason to break
compatibility.

							matz.