From: "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>
Date: 2004-10-01T19:59:40+09:00
Subject: Re: Range syntax theory

On Friday 01 October 2004 02:36 am, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> So in my new language, I'd say "ranges are for integers only", and use
> the .. and ... notations.  Which one for inclusive and which one for
> exclusive?  To be honest, I don't care.  Either one of them would make
> sense once you're used to it.  So, inclusive being the more common case,
> perhaps I'd optimise it accordingly.

Well, while were at it here's mine:

  0..9      inclusive
  0..9.0    exclusive

And .. would be a method.

BTW: why can I say 'a=1,2' and get an array, but not 'a=(1,2)' ?

T.