From: "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>
Date: 2004-10-01T11:23:19+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-dev summary 24298-24353

On Thursday 30 September 2004 09:07 pm, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: ruby-dev summary 24298-24353"
>
>     on Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:52:34 +0900, "trans.  (T. Onoma)" 
<transami@runbox.com> writes:
> |> Hmm, "fanctor".  I like the name.
> |
> |Is a new class required? I think, Proc could add this feature and remain
> |backward compatible.
>
> I just said I liked the name. ;-)
> I'm not yet sure if we need a new class.
>
> 							matz.

In that case you might want this:

  # functor.rb

  class Functor
    def initialize(&func)
      @func = func
    end
    def method_missing(op, *args)
      @func.call(op, *args)
    end
  end

Shhh... Don't tell anyone. It's my favorite secret weapon ;)

T.

-- 
( o _  カラチ
 //    trans.
/ \    transami@runbox.com

I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
-Mark Twain