From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-10-01T10:07:30+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-dev summary 24298-24353

Hi,

In message "Re: ruby-dev summary 24298-24353"
    on Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:52:34 +0900, "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@runbox.com> writes:

|> Hmm, "fanctor".  I like the name.
|
|Is a new class required? I think, Proc could add this feature and remain 
|backward compatible.

I just said I liked the name. ;-)
I'm not yet sure if we need a new class.

							matz.