From: gabriele renzi Date: 2004-09-29T18:09:19+09:00 Subject: Re: Any YARV pre-questions in RubyConf2004? SASADA Koichi ha scritto: > AOT compiler seems more easier to implement. (bytecode -> C code) then another question: - how fast this would be? IIRC there was a python2c compiler, but it meet the same barriers that the python VM hits, like loosing lot of time in method lookup. It has the advantage of obfuscate the code, for those who want it, but little performance gain. I remeber this from reading the StarKiller paper (python->c++ compiler+type_inferencer)