From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2004-09-28T21:12:40+09:00
Subject: Re: Best name for "this method" ?

Hi --

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, trans.  (T. Onoma) wrote:

>    h = { a: 1, b: 2 }
>    h.a  #=> 1
>    h.b  #=> 2
> 
> That would be sweet. And would make the above possible without a new class. I 
> know, method name clash is bad --and there's little one can do to get around 
> it. Perhaps alternate notation?
> 
>    h:a
>    h:b

What's wrong with h[:a] ?


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net