From: "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>
Date: 2004-09-21T18:30:15+09:00
Subject: Re: methods with and without !

On Tuesday 21 September 2004 01:48 am, Mehr, Assaph (Assaph) wrote:
> Another, hard learned, lesson is that bang methods may also return
> something else than the reciever

It would seem to me that this *may* ought to be *must*, albeit it is not 
enforced by the language, but I wonder if it could be?

-- 
( o _  カラチ
 //    trans.
/ \    transami@runbox.com

I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
-Mark Twain