From: Carl Youngblood <carl.youngblood@...>
Date: 2004-09-11T07:59:13+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] SQLite/Ruby 2.0.1 BETA

What about searching to see if there is no SELECT in the SQL and
executing it immediately if not?  Too kludgy?

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 04:46:45 +0900, Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> Vincent Isambart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Great job for SQLite/Ruby. It is really great to be able to prepare
> > statements. I have played a little with it today and I have a few remarks:
> > - when you have a statement that does inserts, you must call next on the
> > result set to really execute the statement: stmt.execute { |result|
> > result.next } # the statement is not executed if next is not called
> > It would be great to have it in the FAQ, as it took me some time to
> > understand why my inserts where not working.
> > - a little mistake in the doc SQLite::Statement doc:
> > stmt.bind_variables( 15, "hello" ) should be stmt.bind_params( 15,
> > "hello" )
> > (it was not updated for 2.0.1)
> >
> > Continue you great work ^o^
> >
> > Vincent Isambart
> 
> Thanks, Vincent! Great feedback--I'll get your suggestions incorporated
> into the documentation.
> 
> Also, would a Statement#execute_immediate method help? It would not take
> a block and would always return +nil+, but then you wouldn't have to do
> an explicit "next" on the result set.
> 
> 
> 
> - Jamis
> 
> --
> Jamis Buck
> jgb3@email.byu.edu
> http://www.jamisbuck.org/jamis
> 
> "I use octal until I get to 8, and then I switch to decimal."
> 
>