From: Robert Klemme <bob.news@...>
Date: 2004-09-09T18:55:08+09:00
Subject: Re: module_function question


"ts" <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:200409090935.i899ZbC14899@moulon.inra.fr...
> >>>>> "R" == Robert Klemme <bob.news@gmx.net> writes:
>
> R> Variant 1
> R> Variant 2
>
>  don't work : call_test1 and call_test2 are not module functions

I know that these do not exactly the same as module_function but Martin
seemed to need only the module instance singleton methods and not instance
methods.

> R> Variant 3
> R> Variant 4
>
>  all methods after #module_function are module_functions (not only
call_),
>  perhaps this is not what he want

I think he wanted a fast and error safe way to define a set of singleton
methods for a module instance.  That's what I extract from his postings -
but I could be wrong of course.

> R> Do you need more?
>
>  yes :-)

I could come up with some permutations... :-))

Kind regards

    robert