From: Bill Kelly Date: 2004-09-09T08:23:17+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby-Nuby forum From: "James Britt" > James Edward Gray II wrote: > > > > My suggestion was that ALL Nuby messages be moved to Ruby Talk and gain > > a [NUBY] if needed. That seems to keep Ruby Talk in the loop, as many > > have requested. Plus, if anyone isn't interested in the Nuby list > > traffic it's trivial to filter out. > > Some comments: > > * It's trivial to filter out [NUBY], but as I'll be doing the filtering > after messages are downloaded, it's still traffic. Might be small, > probably won't matter to me, but might be an issue for some. > > * Essentially, doing this means that everyone subscribed to ruby-talk > becomes subscribed to nuby-talk. So, why not just post to ruby-talk with > [NUBY] in the subject, and tell nubies to filter out anything that > doesn't have that string? [...] > But, for now, I'm going to wave the buzz-word wand and declare YAGNI. I would be inclined toward the YAGNI razor myself, except for all the recent assertions that there are newbies who are too shy to post here. So I wondered if there might be a way to address both "no need to split ruby-talk" and "less intimidating forum for beginners" at the same time. So the motivation was to provide a (presumably) more comfortable place for beginners to post, while in actuality bridging the Nuby list with ruby-talk--because *we* know no-one here in ruby-talk would be anything but kind and helpful replying to a message that originated from the Nuby list. Eventually beginners could transition to ruby-talk when they felt comfortable - and, surprise! All these familiar faces (as it were) here in ruby-talk who have been helping to answer questions on the beginner list all the while. > Go grab PHPNuke or something, start a web site, and tell newbies that > they are invited to help build a pure-Ruby bulletin board package. Eat > your own dog food. Learn by doing, make mistakes together, track what > issues newcomers have, document the learning process. Archive old code > so that people can better understand how the thinking process evolves. Interesting . . . . :) Regards, Bill