From: James Edward Gray II Date: 2004-09-08T23:41:13+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby-Nuby forum On Sep 8, 2004, at 8:52 AM, David Ross wrote: > your second accessment is what I meant. Not quite. See below... > ex. > > - I sent email to ruby.newprogrammers, it goes to that > list only The majority here has expressed a strong desire to see what goes on in any Nuby forum, so this doesn't seem like the way to go. My suggestion was that ALL Nuby messages be moved to Ruby Talk and gain a [NUBY] if needed. That seems to keep Ruby Talk in the loop, as many have requested. Plus, if anyone isn't interested in the Nuby list traffic it's trivial to filter out. > - I send another one with "[RT] help me" to > ruby.newprogrammers, it goes to the Ruby-talk list as > well This seems wrong to me, simply because it requires intimate knowledge of how the messages are handled. The people of this list have asked to stay informed and Nubies want help from those in the know, so it seems this should be the default behavior. > - I send emails all day to ruby-talk, they stay there, > if I post a reply to one which is prefixed by [RT], it > goes to the ruby.newprogrammers list This really confuses me. Posting to Ruby Talk with [RT] (presumably short for "Ruby Talk") sends the message to Ruby Nuby? That doesn't make sense to me. It seems like 90% of the messages that are sent to Ruby Talk and need to be forwarded are going to be replies to posts that came from there with answers to their questions. With the above procedures in place, those replies should have a [NUBY] in their subject, so the default behavior should be to move those messages across. The special cases are that a Ruby Talk response may not need to go back (I expect this would be pretty rare) or a Ruby Talk post should also appear on the Nuby list. Adding and removing the [NUBY] handles both of these, as needed. This keeps all the tricky cases handled on the Ruby Talk side, which seems best. Well, those are my thoughts, at any rate. James Edward Gray II