From: Yukihiro Matsumoto Date: 2004-09-04T18:53:52+09:00 Subject: Re: OK... :) question about hash and array literals Hi, In message "Re: OK... :) question about hash and array literals" on Sat, 4 Sep 2004 12:54:52 +0900, Hal Fulton writes: |Is there a method that does get called (I think not), or could |in theory such a thing be implemented? Not planned, just because changing semantics of literals are too dangerous, as dangerous as macros for my eyes. matz. p.s. I'm thinking of preserving Hash order by not re-implement it by using Tree or something, but by saving key order information along with hash tables.