From: Benny <linux@...>
Date: 2004-09-03T22:30:17+09:00
Subject: Re: [Design advice] including a file as code ('as is')

David A. Black wrote:

> Anyway, as for another way: you could just 'require' the file,
> although then you end up with the methods being private.��But�if�you
> know what they're called that may be not a big problem:
no, it won't work in my case:

in the real app 'MyTest' are different classes for each include and all of
them have the same parent class. in this parent class is a method defined to
make a new object of any given 'MyTest'-class (i.e. from another include)
and to invoke a given method of this class. this methods are unknown for
main.rb (execept the one and only "run" method that has to be in the
include). additionally there might be class methods that should be called
this way (without the creation of an object of this class)

benny