From: vruz <horacio.lopez@...>
Date: 2004-09-03T06:38:33+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] ri-ruby 0.1.1

> Sorry if this has been discussed before, but the name 'ri-ruby" suggests
> that this is ri for Ruby. Which it isn't.   Might it be more helpful to
> use a name indicating that it hooks ri into emacs?

You're right, it's somewhat misleading (it misleaded me at least when
I first read it)
Would you mind if I suggest a different name ?

How about  ri-macs ?


-- 
--- vruz