From: Ara.T.Howard@...
Date: 2004-09-03T02:25:36+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby blog software.

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

>
> On Sep 2, 2004, at 11:21, Jamis Buck wrote:
>
>> :D Well, if I had shell access to the box on which my blog is
>> published, your CVS approach would be wonderful. Unfortunately, all I
>> have is FTP... But wait a minute; am I a Ruby programmer, or aren't I?
>> :) I'm sure I could make it work, for me. My wife, however, would
>> certainly prefer the web interface to a
>> text-editor/local-web-server/upload-process approach. It would
>> certainly make Rublog that much more attractive to the
>> "non-programming-casual-blogger" demographic.
>
> I'd happily roll that in if you wanted to add an extension. It'd have
> to offer a choice of markup languages, and should ideally support some
> minimal workflow (pending to active). I'd probably see it as being a
> separate CGI that shared libraries with RubLog, rather than necessarily
> being part of the same application, but I could be swayed either way.

dave-

downloaded 0.8.0 from sourceforge (no download on rubyforge?).  in any case,
trying to fire it up and getting errors regarding 'require "markup/xxx"'.  did
a 'cp -r /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8./rdoc ./markup' and that has fixed many of
the problems.  i'm wondering, however, has the installed directory hierarchy
of rdoc changed, or is this a bug?

btw.  so far it seems to run under webrick o.k. - at least i'm getting
something.

-a
--
===============================================================================
| EMAIL   :: Ara [dot] T [dot] Howard [at] noaa [dot] gov
| PHONE   :: 303.497.6469
| A flower falls, even though we love it;
| and a weed grows, even though we do not love it. 
|   --Dogen
===============================================================================