From: David Ross <drossruby@...>
Date: 2004-08-31T02:17:21+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby Web Hosts

hush linux bitch. I don't even have time for people
like you.
--- Mikael Brockman <mikael@phubuh.org> wrote:

> David Ross <drossruby@yahoo.com> writes:
> 
> > --- Andreas Schwarz <usenet@andreas-s.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > David Ross wrote:
> > > > --- Matt Lawrence <matt@technoronin.com>
> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >>On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, T. Onoma wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Please recommend Ruby-supporting web hosts. I
> am
> > > >>
> > > >>currently looking at the
> > > >>
> > > >>>following providers in this order of
> preference:
> > > >>
> > > >>You might also want to check out some of the
> folks
> > > >>who do User Mode Linux 
> > > >>hosting.  Basically, you get root access to
> your
> > > own
> > > >>virtual linux system 
> > > >>and can install just about anything you want.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > If you are going to get a setup like this, you
> > > might
> > > > as well go secure and get a FreeBSD jail
> system.
> > > Don't
> > > > want to get cracked ;)
> > > 
> > > To what extent is UML less secure than a BSD
> jail?
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > not to even start it. #1 BSD is more secure and
> can be
> > used as a good desktop or server. (*not: how you
> > install software doesn't judge it as a desktop) 
> >
> > [...]
> 
> Please take your enormous dumps of crap elsewhere. 
> I suggest some
> advocacy group on USENET.
> 
> 
> 



		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. 
http://messenger.yahoo.com