From: Mikael Brockman <mikael@...>
Date: 2004-08-31T02:14:45+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby Web Hosts

David Ross <drossruby@yahoo.com> writes:

> --- Andreas Schwarz <usenet@andreas-s.net> wrote:
> 
> > David Ross wrote:
> > > --- Matt Lawrence <matt@technoronin.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, T. Onoma wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Please recommend Ruby-supporting web hosts. I am
> > >>
> > >>currently looking at the
> > >>
> > >>>following providers in this order of preference:
> > >>
> > >>You might also want to check out some of the folks
> > >>who do User Mode Linux 
> > >>hosting.  Basically, you get root access to your
> > own
> > >>virtual linux system 
> > >>and can install just about anything you want.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > If you are going to get a setup like this, you
> > might
> > > as well go secure and get a FreeBSD jail system.
> > Don't
> > > want to get cracked ;)
> > 
> > To what extent is UML less secure than a BSD jail?
> > 
> > 
> 
> not to even start it. #1 BSD is more secure and can be
> used as a good desktop or server. (*not: how you
> install software doesn't judge it as a desktop) 
>
> [...]

Please take your enormous dumps of crap elsewhere.  I suggest some
advocacy group on USENET.