From: James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...>
Date: 2004-08-28T00:53:24+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby implemented in C and not C++?

Austin Ziegler wrote:
> Also, it's apparently much easier to implement an OO language in a
> non-OO language, because then you don't confuse yourself with
> conflicting object models, or find yourself tempted to make the
> language work with the different object model.
> 
> But, as always, IANM, so those are my best guesses and that's it.


Isn't that pretty much what matz once said, someplace?  In some 
interview, I think.


James


> 
> -austin