From: Robert Klemme Date: 2004-08-11T16:31:13+09:00 Subject: Re: stupid question: Object#name "David A. Black" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0408101652300.22756-100000@wobblini... > Hi -- > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Gavri Savio Fernandez wrote: > > > > From: Mark Hubbart > > > Subject: Re: stupid question: Object#name > > > > > This is a fairly common OO topic, and there is a pretty good > > > description of classes and objects here: > > > > > > http://www.visibleworkings.com/little-ruby/Chapter3.pdf > > > > One part of this chapter (Page 5) is driving me crazy. I tried it in irb and it doesn't work as described in the chapter. > > > > >From the book (paraphrased(?)......sort of) > > > > #################################################### > > class Celery > > end > > > > class IceCream > > def IceCream.new(starting_licks) > > Celery.new > > end > > end > > > > class IceCream > > def IceCream.small > > new(80) > > end > > end > > > > ....I can send messages to what > > class answers, like this: > > > > food = IceCream.small > > more_food = food.class.small > > > > Both food and more_food would be > > instances of Celery. > > ####################################################### > > > > I understand how food is an instance of Celery. > > But how is more_food an instance of Celery? > > It isn't. Maybe Brian meant that second line to be: > > more_food = food.class.new > > but I'm not sure. Illustration: >> food = IceCream.small => # >> food.class => Celery >> more_food = food.class.small NoMethodError: undefined method `small' for Celery:Class from (irb):17 >> more_food = food.class.new => # >> Regards robert