From: David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>
Date: 2004-08-11T03:53:01+09:00
Subject: Re: Opinions of RubyForge's performance over the weekend (CVS, Web, etc)

Austin Ziegler wrote:
> I found CVS performance acceptable. The website, however, is typically
> slow. The problem, I think, is not so much the actual speed of the
> server or the line, but that it looks like the pages are highly
> complex and not cached (and neither are the images?) in any way. It's
> bad when I can see Firefox rendering each element individually.

 From peeking at the HTTP headers, the images are normal I think (E-Tag 
and Last-Modified are present) so they should be cache-able as any other 
static files.

And I guess the major bandwidth sucker would be file downloads, anyway.

-- 
dave