From: Edgardo Hames <ehames@...>
Date: 2004-08-07T06:36:44+09:00
Subject: Re: Defining a new function by composition

On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 06:27:11 +0900, mark sparshatt
<msparshatt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> Though this won't do what you want since there isn't a method split! for
> array.
> 

Since there is a method push which modifies the receiver, I believe
pop should do the same. I find it kind of odd this isn't so.

Regards.
Ed