From: ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)
Date: 2004-08-03T08:21:34+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby's future

In article <144121783421.20040802221513@scriptolutions.com>,
Lothar Scholz  <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote:
>Hello Kevin,
>
>KH> I've been contemplating using Ruby for an upcoming large project, but became
>KH> concerned when I learned that the next versions of Ruby (1.9, 2.0) will
>KH> include sweeping backwards-incompatible changes (ref:
>KH> http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby?Rite). Does this not raise some concern with
>
>Rite is not Ruby 2.0

But doesn't Ruby 2.0 contain Rite?
I guess I'm under the impression the Rite is the virtual machine for Ruby 
2.0 - is that true?  So I'm thinking that there won't be a Ruby 2.0 until 
the Rite VM is complete - am I mistaken?

Phil