From: Raphael Bauduin <rb@...>
Date: 2004-07-26T22:46:51+09:00
Subject: Re: rubyonrails and cgikit comparison

Florian Weber wrote:
>> The designer is there for that I guess.
>> I tell him, "hey, the structure of the address has changed. Replace 
>> the cgikit
>> address by 2 tags address1 and address2. Those are just strings". And 
>> he know he just has to add <cgikit name="address1"/> and <cgikit 
>> name="address1"/> where he sees fit.
>> Again, he doesn't care of the name of my variable eg.
> 
> 
> same thing in rails. you just tell her/him to use @person.address1 and @
> person.adress2 =)

I didn't mean it's easier with cgikit, I thought you suggested it was more
difficult in cgikit  ;-)

But in your example, if I change my variable name, I have to change the template, 
as with cgikit, I just have to change the binding, which is a much smaller and
simpler file than the template.

Anyway, we've come to a point where we discuss really minor things. I'll test
Rails to get a better idea of how I can limit my code in the template, and
I encourage you to test cgikit, if only to confirm your opinion on the <cgikit> tags ;-)


Raph