From: Florian Weber <csshsh@...>
Date: 2004-07-26T03:48:30+09:00
Subject: Re: rubyonrails and cgikit comparison

> That's just the point we disagree on. I don't think we should have
> real programming in the template(like references to variables), some 
> basic logic only. In short, I like the presence of the binding, you 
> don't. That's ok with me ;-)

why shouldnt we have a real programming language in the template?

what if the presentation logic in our template is very very complicated?

just moving the complicated presentation logic out of the template into
another part like a binding or a ruby class doesnt change anything. its
just a form of indirection..