From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2004-07-22T13:07:55+09:00
Subject: Re: [PATCH] was - Re: substring by range parameter (bug?)

Hi,

In message "[PATCH] was - Re: substring by range parameter (bug?)"
    on 04/07/22, "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@noaa.gov> writes:

|if you look at the source, it is clear that rb_range_beg_len intends to fail
|with ranges like -1...-42.  i think it is a bug that it does not.  this patch
|should fix it:

I think I understand you, but not sure.  Can you show me an example of
wrong behavior?

							matz.