From: Carl Youngblood <carl.youngblood@...>
Date: 2004-07-22T01:32:37+09:00
Subject: Re: mod_ruby or fastcgi+ruby?

Neither is very hard to set up in a run-of-the-mill unix environment.

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:47:03 +0900, Gully Foyle
<nospam@nospamnospamnospam.com> wrote:
> What are the pros & cons of mod_ruby vs fastcgi+ruby?  Ruby will most
> likely be the latest stable snapshot (1.8.2).
> 
> The only requirement is the server running Apache 2.x (not 1.3) on
> Redhat Advanced Server 3.x (kernel 2.4.20-smp).
> 
> The site won't be high-volume but it needs to be stable/robust (for a
> single server website).
> 
> I'm getting the impression mod_ruby is a lot easier to setup (super
> simple apache config).  I'd love to hear about any hidden gotchas with
> either scenario.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>