From: Josh Huber Date: 2004-07-21T05:51:34+09:00 Subject: Re: openssl not getting built Hal Fulton writes: > However, I *thought* that I had it installed, for two reasons: > 1. I can use ssh and scp. Don't they depend on openssl? Or is > there a lib distro without headers (rpm I guess)? Well, yeah -- you don't need to have the headers installed for runtime. Presumably you are using a binary (rpm) version of ssh? Also, it appears as though openssh doesn't link against openssl anyway. $ ldd /usr/bin/openssl libssl.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x40027000) > 2. And yet I have old openssl.so files which I believed came from > building ruby; which would mean I'd have to have an ssl.h. Yeah, and you haven't removed the openssl-devel package, etc? I'd recommend just installing the RH openssl-devel package. Of course, I'm not sure what the best way to do this is, since I've been using Debian for a long time. Personally, I think splitting a package up into runtime/dev is a good thing, since it reduces clutter and more easily lets you have two versions of the same library installed. -- Josh Huber