From: "Anders K. Madsen" <madsen@...>
Date: 2004-07-20T16:12:06+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby Specification

--Signature=_Tue__20_Jul_2004_09_07_18_+0200_K9DCsYZ6TvxufFlu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 03:00:44 +0900
David Ross <drossruby@yahoo.com> wrote:

[snippety-snip]
> I want to make sure my code stays under the BSD
> license. Ruby's license confuses me a bit. --David Ross

Ehrm, this is just a suggestion, I'm not really into the whole licensing
thingy, so this might not be a solution.
But, why not get into a dialogue with matz about this?
I mean, he must know what's right and wrong regarding the Ruby License.

And just a little note.
I don't see why some people (e.g. Lothar) makes a problem out of someone
wanting to make rubycc. IMO a Ruby compiler wouldn't hurt anyone. Even
if there are some approximating the functionality around already. If
they dislike this project, they should just ignore it and stop being so
damn negative about it! It's not a very creative approach to anything!

I'd love to help, but unfortunately I'm most certainly not skilled
enough for such a project.

Best regards and good luck on the project!

	Madsen

-- 
 Anders K. Madsen --- http://lillesvin.linux.dk

"There are 10 types of people in the world.
 Those who understand binary - and those who don't."

--Signature=_Tue__20_Jul_2004_09_07_18_+0200_K9DCsYZ6TvxufFlu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA/MSplNHJe/JASHcRAguEAJ9L/vZzBGythQkCxCHND9CwL7LkFQCcDYk3
lDrNYR2yDieLJeatbGboTvc=
=E7/4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Tue__20_Jul_2004_09_07_18_+0200_K9DCsYZ6TvxufFlu--