From: Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>
Date: 2004-07-17T04:02:16+09:00
Subject: Re: Altering method lookup

Claus Spitzer <DocBoobenstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> not what I intend it to do (eventually). What I thought would happen
> is that when the object instance first gets the message for bar, bar
> (which would be an instance of Method) would be still undefined, so
> method_missing would get a message to look up bar, which is why I used
> method_missing to start with.

I'm not sure I understand this - why would you expect bar to be
undefined at this point?

martin