From: Robert Klemme <bob.news@...>
Date: 2004-07-15T20:37:17+09:00
Subject: Re: 'Initializing' modules


"Elias Athanasopoulos" <elathan@phys.uoa.gr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:20040714024430.GA810@velka.phys.uoa.gr...
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:02:21PM +0900, George Moschovitis wrote:
> > Another surpising thing:
> >
> > include A, B seems to include the Modules in the reverse order
> > include A; include B works as expected.
>
> Since nobody replied and I think it's an interesting question,
> does anyone know why this happens?

I guess the reason is that in the first case [A,B] is inserted into the
sequence of ancestors as is, while in the second case first A is inserted
and then B, which effectively yields [derived, B, A, base, ...] as
ancestors.

    robert