From: sera@... (Francis Hwang)
Date: 2004-07-13T10:37:23+09:00
Subject: Re: Business application building with Ruby

I don't think there's any consensus as to what version numbers mean.
In the case of Lafcadio I can tell you that although it's not done,
it's also used on real systems handling real users and non-trivial
volume. (I believe the same can be said for ActiveRecord, too.)

The site where I mainly work gets 3m hits/month; that's backed by
Lafcadio. In fact I make sure to always have a stable bugfix branch
and a dev branch so users can choose their level of risk. I use the
stable bugfix branch for that main site.

Francis

Alexey Verkhovsky <alex@verk.info> wrote in message news:<1089461690.1011.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>...
> Thanks for the responses. 
> 
> What should I make of the somewhat scary fact that most of the
> components mentioned, including ALL persistence layer stuff, have
> version numbers 0.something? 
> 
> I thought, by convention, the first version that project developers
> consider "production-grade" would be numbered 1.0. Am I wrong?
> 
> Best regards,
> Alexey Verkhovsky