From: richard lyman Date: 2004-07-10T06:47:01+09:00 Subject: Re: Secure Ruby Compiler The version of theWRAP that I just looked at didn't compress at all... ... in fact the website says it doesn't compress... ... for me compression is a 'must-have-feature'. I still think that: 1. exerb 2. EZExerb (yes I'm the creator, so I'm biased ;-) ) 3. NSIS is the way to go for getting a ruby project distributed on windows platforms. I changed the compression in NSIS from the default of zlib to LZW and I went from 5.1 megs of scattered files to 1.3 megs in a single file (Zlib went from 5.1 to 1.7). -Rich On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 04:28:54 +0900, tony summerfelt wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 17:32:46 +0900, you wrote: > > >Randy Lawrence wrote: > > >> One of the killer features lacking in most scripting languages is the > >> ability to "compile" or sufficiently "obfuscate" scripts so they can be > >> distributed for execution without revealing the original source code. > > >> Is this possible with Ruby today? If not, is this something planned for > >> future versions? Are there 3rd party tools that do this? > > unless i missed it nobody mentioned 'thewrap' > (http://trondoc.ezwebtech.com/theWRAP/). the price is hard to beat. > > i've used it to successfully wrap wxruby programs (well under 5mb). i > think it uses upx somewhere in the process. it will prevent 'casual > copying' > >