From: "Mauricio Fernández" Date: 2004-07-01T02:38:43+09:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] arrayfields-3.0.0 On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:12:52AM +0900, Ara.T.Howard wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Mehr, Assaph (Assaph) wrote: > > > > >1. The VERSION file in arrayfields-3.1.0.tgz still reads 3.0.0. > >2. Can you release as a gem? And to save you the trouble... > > > > thanks alot mehr- > > i'll try to get to this today - it's one of those things i've been meaning > to > do (for all my stuff) but haven't been able to get to... i'm a little > concerned about how the gem versioning technique will play with mine, any > ideas on that? Yours has got stronger semantics than RubyGems' (which basically provides the methods but sets no policy), so it will work just fine if users do require_gem "arrayfields", ">=3.1", "<4.0" although there's no support for the backwards compatibility indicator (3rd digit). (not 100% sure about the syntax however) -- Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable) batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com If you want to travel around the world and be invited to speak at a lot of different places, just write a Unix operating system. -- Linus Torvalds