From: Andrew Walrond Date: 2004-06-30T06:59:35+09:00 Subject: Re: system() shouldn't throw exceptions, should it? On Tuesday 29 Jun 2004 17:18, Lennon Day-Reynolds wrote: > I think that throwing an exception is a much more appropriate and > idiomatic way to handle errors than just silently failing. If it's > going to break a lot of your code, though, why not use something like I agree. It would have been better to throw exceptions, and I can easily change my code to handle either case, as you suggest. But... I guess I was a bit suprised that this fundamental behaviour was changed; It obviously breaks backwards compatibility with previous versions; It broke at least one of my apps and I'll have to audit the rest. Many existing apps _will_be_broken_ by this change. Hence my question: Assuming the change is intentional, when will it appear in a release (this cropped up with somebody using a nightly snapshot) Andrew Walrond