From: Florian Weber <csshsh@...>
Date: 2004-06-21T04:23:00+09:00
Subject: Re: rubys web performance


> I don't know rails but if you work with a non cgi architecture, like
> FCGI, webrick, mod_ruby. Write an init page that requires all files
> (not just the toplevel ones) that will be loaded.

that means that mod_ruby and fcgi actually dont cache all the
loaded classes? i thought exactly thats what it does. when i profile
my ruby test, the execution via mod_ruby takes just about as
long as the execution under cgi minus the time it takes to load
the classes.

so here it seems like really all the classes are cached..

however im still wondering why my heavy php app, where
classes are not cached, no accelerator is used, etc is even a bit
faster than a super simple ruby example where classes are cached..