From: Dave Burt <burtdav@...>
Date: 2004-06-18T06:28:24+09:00
Subject: Re: [RCR]  introducing Hash-like mixin

"Josh Huber" <huber+rt@alum.wpi.edu> wrote in message
news:877ju6kkfs.fsf@amalthea.paradoxical.net...
> Mark Hubbart <discord@mac.com> writes:
>
> > PairAssociable? Associable? :)
>
> Hmm, it sounds odd to me, but it has the right definition:
>
>   associable
>        adj : capable of being associated; "words associable with
>              politics"
>
> I guess I don't hear "associable" too often...
>
> -- 
> Josh Huber

No, it's not right - the container itself is an associator; it associates
its key/value pairs, which are associable.

I recommend Associative