From: Austin Ziegler Date: 2004-06-16T03:29:01+09:00 Subject: Re: undefine tony summerfelt [mailto:snowzone5@hotmail.com] : > On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:35:33 +0900, you wrote: >> Can't you just use "=nil" to achive the same thing? >> (just using the fact that 'nil' is false) > > in perl it's null. which is what defined() and undef() test for... In ruby, you can *always* do: foo.nil? This will return true or false. Similarly, you can also test for [].empty? (-> true) on a lot of containers, etc. -austin -- austin ziegler * austin.ziegler@evault.com