From: Sean O'Dell <sean@...>
Date: 2004-06-15T03:27:50+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1

On Monday 14 June 2004 11:23, James Britt wrote:
> Gennady wrote:
>
>
> ...
>
> > Sometimes I even get into trouble because of alphabetical ordering we
> > have now in Test::Unit. So I would be happy if Nathaniel finally decides
> > to implement random test invocation on every run.
>
> No no no.  Not random order; *arbitrary* order.
>
> Please get with the program.

Arbitrary isn't an ordering method per se.  Alphabetic can be arbitrary, as 
can random.  You can say alphabetic and arbitrary and be talking about the 
same thing.  Any method used that is arrived at imperiously and without solid 
reason or principal is arbitrary.

	Sean O'Dell