From: Sean O'Dell Date: 2004-06-15T00:59:45+09:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 On Sunday 13 June 2004 00:13, Jean-Hugues ROBERT wrote: > At 08:12 13/06/2004 +0900, you wrote: > > > >When you're given no choice, as far as you're concerned as a library user, > >they're run in an arbitrary order. The fact that it turns out they are > > run alphabetically doesn't change the fact that the system of ordering is > > arbitrary. There is no rhyme, reason or principal determining the order; > > it was decided by the author at his prerogative. If the tests were run > > according to the length of the method names, that would still be an > > arbitrary order. As far as I'm concerned, the order that tests are run > > is a black box. > > I suspect that there is some misunderstanding here. That you would > call the order "arbitrary" conveys some negative connotation that > you certainly want to avoid not to appear rude or condescending. > In France a typical "arbitrary" decision was King's one to put you > on jail (lettre de cachet). As a result "arbitrary" tends to > mean "lack of respect". > > I also suspect that the decision to "order" tests is not at all > arbitrary compared to the decision not to sort tests. I tend to > think that it is a good thing to order things and alphabetic order > is a reasonable choice that is easy to understand by everybody. Ordering tests alphabetically, to me, is arbitrary. I can't say I really know how many people got involved in the decision to order tests alphabetically, but I can say that whether it's one or a thousand, the method makes zero sense to me and it's arbitrary as far as I'm concerned. I am about to put the word "arbitrary" back into every single celsoft.com/Battery document I've written if people refuse to respect my opinion in the matter and continue to berate me over it. I took it out initially trying to avoid hurting anyone's feelings, but since it seems apparent that this discussion is going to go on and on, I feel almost compelled to hold up the word on a billboard. I used the word properly, and I still meant what I said. I'm starting to feel sorry for taking the word out of the docs. Sean O'Dell