[#101991] Gateway appears to be working!! — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

13 messages 2004/06/01

[#102028] What is the equivalent of Python's "%s" % "MyString"? — "Sam Sungshik Kong" <ssk@...>

Hello!

20 messages 2004/06/01

[#102050] Obfuscating Ruby Code. — "Ken Hilton" <kenosis@...>

Does anyone know of a Ruby source code obfuscator that's reliable and

56 messages 2004/06/01

[#102170] Floating point division operator /. (or fdiv method) — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

31 messages 2004/06/02
[#102247] Re: [RCR] Floating point division operator /. (or fdiv method) — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/06/03

[#102231] Reply wasn't posted; will test new post — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Hi ALL:

38 messages 2004/06/03
[#102236] Re: Reply wasn't posted; will test new post — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/06/03

[#102241] Re: Reply wasn't posted; will test new post — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/03

Hi --

[#102366] Active Record 0.8.2: Inheritable callback ques — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Active Record 0.8.2?

13 messages 2004/06/04

[#102401] Problem Installing Ruby Gems 0.4.0 on XP not segfault — "Ernie" <erne@...>

I get the following error I'm running Ruby 1.8 windows version installed

10 messages 2004/06/04

[#102412] Check assertion in Ruby — Edgardo Hames <ehames@...>

Hi, everybody. I would like to use an assert like function to test the

20 messages 2004/06/04

[#102431] How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

I need to detect when an object is a hash-like container for other objects,

137 messages 2004/06/05
[#102456] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/06/05

[#102495] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/05

On Saturday 05 June 2004 02:28, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#102496] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/06/05

[#102499] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/05

On Saturday 05 June 2004 10:39, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#102507] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/06/05

[#102514] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/06

On Saturday 05 June 2004 13:30, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#102530] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "John W. Long" <ng@...> 2004/06/06

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#102535] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/06

On Saturday 05 June 2004 21:05, John W. Long wrote:

[#102563] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com> 2004/06/06

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#102573] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/06

Hi --

[#102465] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/06/05

il Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:15:37 +0900, "Sean O'Dell" <sean@celsoft.com> ha

[#102509] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "John W. Long" <ng@...> 2004/06/05

[#102516] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/06

On Saturday 05 June 2004 15:01, John W. Long wrote:

[#102649] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Dave Burt" <burtdav@...> 2004/06/07

param.respond_to? '[]' and

[#102445] class A::B verses module A ; class B — quixoticsycophant@... (Jeff Mitchell)

module A

14 messages 2004/06/05

[#102597] Segfault on embedded ruby. — Godot <garciamj@...>

16 messages 2004/06/06

[#102601] Instiki 0.9.0: Rendering improvements, Latex integration, OS X version — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Instiki 0.9.0?

9 messages 2004/06/06

[#102675] Waiting for condor output files — Milo Thurston <nospam@...>

I've got a script that submits a whole load of condor jobs, and has to

11 messages 2004/06/07

[#102710] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Austin Ziegler" <Austin.Ziegler@...>

> dblack@wobblini.evault.com

18 messages 2004/06/07

[#102716] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Kloubakov, Yura" <YKloubakov@...>

22 messages 2004/06/07
[#102729] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Monday 07 June 2004 16:13, Kloubakov, Yura wrote:

[#102789] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/08

> I've worked with some fresh guys right

[#102796] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Tuesday 08 June 2004 07:55, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#102808] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/08

> Non-college grads, though, never got hired unless they could prove their

[#102819] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Tuesday 08 June 2004 10:03, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#102822] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/06/08

On Wednesday, 9 June 2004 at 3:52:21 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#102823] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/08

>

[#102824] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Tuesday 08 June 2004 12:12, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#102731] Interfaces and semantics (or, how to hashpipe a duck) — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

Semantics, James Thurber notwithstanding, is not a town in Ohio.

34 messages 2004/06/08
[#102814] Re: Interfaces and semantics (or, how to hashpipe a duck) — djberg96@... (Daniel Berger) 2004/06/08

"Sean O'Dell" <sean@celsoft.com> wrote in message news:<200406080736.32485.sean@celsoft.com>...

[#102818] Re: Interfaces and semantics (or, how to hashpipe a duck) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Tuesday 08 June 2004 11:23, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#102839] Re: Interfaces and semantics (or, how to hashpipe a duck) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/08

Hi --

[#102788] ruby and mustard — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

20 messages 2004/06/08

[#102817] Ruby/Interface — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

Ruby/Interface 0.1-1

18 messages 2004/06/08

[#102863] oddities with select — Ben Giddings <bg-rubytalk@...>

I'm trying to use Ruby to talk to an network application, and noticed

21 messages 2004/06/08

[#102890] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Gennady [mailto:gfb@tonesoft.com] wrote:

39 messages 2004/06/09
[#102891] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/06/09

On Wednesday, 9 June 2004 at 11:46:12 +0900, "Pe?a, Botp" wrote:

[#102896] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Dan Tapp <dhtapp@..._sig_line.com> 2004/06/09

Jim Freeze wrote:

[#102900] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/09

I'd be afraid to hire a code-monkey who said yes.

[#102929] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/06/09

On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 01:21, Tyler Zesiger wrote:

[#102930] Re: [OT] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/09

On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:48:30 +0900, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:

[#102931] Re: [OT] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/06/09

On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 09:56, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#102934] Re: [OT] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/06/09

On Wednesday, 9 June 2004 at 23:02:22 +0900, Tom Copeland wrote:

[#102978] Re: [OT] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...> 2004/06/09

At 23:21 09/06/2004 +0900, you wrote:

[#102914] strip DOS ^Ms? — Dick Davies <rasputnik@...>

15 messages 2004/06/09

[#102922] Active Record 0.8.3: Modules, mapping, and transactions — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Active Record 0.8.3?

12 messages 2004/06/09

[#102950] #include <re.h> required for Opteron but not Pentium. — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi

14 messages 2004/06/09
[#103007] Re: #include <re.h> required for Opteron but not Pentium. — Tim Hunter <cyclists@...> 2004/06/09

On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 03:58:55 +0900, Jim Freeze wrote:

[#102951] History of Languages poster from O'Reilly — djberg96@... (Daniel Berger)

Hi all,

12 messages 2004/06/09

[#103072] Graphing 2Ds in Python is pretty easy... — piir@... (Todd Gardner)

Hello everyone,

16 messages 2004/06/10

[#103172] Array#rest — Charles Comstock <cc1@...>

I find myself frequently using array slice of 1..-1, to pass the rest of an

25 messages 2004/06/11

[#103217] Switch to .ruby extension? — doodpants@... (Karl von Laudermann)

The current convention for Ruby source file names is to end them with

72 messages 2004/06/11
[#103228] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/11

The obsessive levels of abbreviation in the *nix world infuriate me.

[#103580] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "SER" <ser@...> 2004/06/14

> I remember when I first started using linux (now I use FreeBSD, which

[#103599] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/14

I don't know how much of the thread you read through, but I repeated at

[#103602] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/14

On Monday 14 June 2004 16:13, Tyler Zesiger wrote:

[#103605] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/06/14

>Most programmers

[#103608] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/15

On Monday 14 June 2004 16:46, Zach Dennis wrote:

[#103618] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/06/15

Quoteing sean@celsoft.com, on Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:40:26AM +0900:

[#103622] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/15

On Monday 14 June 2004 19:09, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#103673] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/06/15

Wrote Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com>, on Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:36:18AM +0900:

[#103239] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? [OT] — Mark Hubbart <discord@...> 2004/06/11

[#103246] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? [OT] — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/11

I think I may be earning myself a reputation as a user-friendliness

[#103252] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? [OT] — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/06/11

[#103258] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? [OT] — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/11

[#103225] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

Battery is a unit testing framework for Ruby. It captures all standard error

61 messages 2004/06/11
[#103236] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/11

Hi --

[#103250] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/11

On Friday 11 June 2004 11:47, David A. Black wrote:

[#103267] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/12

Hi --

[#103275] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/12

On Friday 11 June 2004 18:08, David A. Black wrote:

[#103308] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/12

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#103329] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/12

On Saturday 12 June 2004 03:49, David A. Black wrote:

[#103353] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/12

> arbitrary:

[#103366] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/12

On Saturday 12 June 2004 13:34, David A. Black wrote:

[#103389] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...> 2004/06/13

At 08:12 13/06/2004 +0900, you wrote:

[#103525] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/14

On Sunday 13 June 2004 00:13, Jean-Hugues ROBERT wrote:

[#103533] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...> 2004/06/14

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#103536] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/14

On Monday 14 June 2004 09:27, James Britt wrote:

[#103412] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/06/13

On Jun 12, 2004, at 12:28, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#103413] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/06/13

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#103532] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/14

On Sunday 13 June 2004 07:52, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#103293] Any way to get the calling method's binding? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Something I've wanted to do on a few occasions recently is to evaluate

13 messages 2004/06/12

[#103328] OpenSSL: patch — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...>

Attached is a patch for the Ruby/OpenSSL module, done against the code

25 messages 2004/06/12

[#103334] undefine — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...>

is there a way to undefine a variable?

43 messages 2004/06/12
[#103405] Re: undefine — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/06/13

[#103438] undefine — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/06/13

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:08:48 +0900, you wrote:

[#103465] Re: undefine — Claus Spitzer <DocBoobenstein@...> 2004/06/14

Again, this is where it's useful to consider the OO approach and think

[#103550] undefine — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/06/14

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:18:32 +0900, you wrote:

[#103560] Re: undefine — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/14

> i just need the variable to 'not exist' however it's thought about (by

[#103335] "www.ruby-lang.org" still down for maintenance - thats not good — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2004/06/12

[#103381] Ruby /.'ted — Dan Tapp <dhtapp@..._sig_line.com>

Ruby was just slashdotted under "Developers: Searching for the Best

14 messages 2004/06/13

[#103404] How to read a .csv file into a 2D array? — piir@... (Todd Gardner)

Hello everyone,

16 messages 2004/06/13

[#103468] Non-standard library project — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Hi all,

28 messages 2004/06/14

[#103650] "Litte Ruby" book — Csaba Henk <csaba@..._for_avoiding_spam.org>

The book (or book-germ) entitled "A Little Ruby, A Lot of Objects" was

15 messages 2004/06/15

[#103697] a newbie question about main, Object... — "Sam Sungshik Kong" <ssk@...>

Hello!

14 messages 2004/06/15

[#103742] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Austin Ziegler" <Austin.Ziegler@...>

Sean O'Dell [mailto:sean@celsoft.com] :

17 messages 2004/06/15
[#103744] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/15

On Tuesday 15 June 2004 13:53, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#103874] Bidirectional named pipes on Linux — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

12 messages 2004/06/16

[#103930] introducing Hash-like mixin — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi gurus and nubys,

17 messages 2004/06/17

[#103974] the new great computer language shootout — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

26 messages 2004/06/17
[#103975] Re: the new great computer language shootout — Lennon Day-Reynolds <rcoder@...> 2004/06/17

Part of the speedup appears to be from their use of the Psyco JIT

[#103986] Re: the new great computer language shootout — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/06/17

Lennon Day-Reynolds (rcoder@gmail.com) wrote:

[#103992] Re: the new great computer language shootout — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/06/17

Eric Hodel (drbrain@segment7.net) wrote:

[#103977] How to make generic #== method? — Zakaria <zakaria@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/06/17

[#103993] Generating "real-time" 2D line plots in Windows 2k? — piir@... (Todd Gardner)

Hello everyone,

11 messages 2004/06/17

[#104182] rubys web performance — Florian Weber <csshsh@...>

hi!

31 messages 2004/06/20

[#104222] About top-level method — "Sam Sungshik Kong" <ssk@...>

Hello!

15 messages 2004/06/21

[#104272] A question about Class and Object — "Sam Sungshik Kong" <ssk@...>

Hello!

18 messages 2004/06/21

[#104364] Newbie question - how to replace multiple whitespace within a string? — Brian Tully <btully@...>

Sorry if this is too basic a question but I just inherited a handful of Ruby

10 messages 2004/06/22

[#104455] rubygems thoughts — Hans Fugal <fugalh@...>

My participation here is sporadic at best, so forgive me if these

34 messages 2004/06/24
[#104459] Re: rubygems thoughts — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2004/06/24

[#104465] Re: rubygems thoughts — Hans Fugal <hfugal@...> 2004/06/24

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#104466] Re: rubygems thoughts — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/24

On Thursday 24 June 2004 10:18, Hans Fugal wrote:

[#104494] Is it considered Harmful? — "rolo" <rohitlodha@...>

Hi

133 messages 2004/06/24
[#104495] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/24

On Thursday 24 June 2004 16:15, rolo wrote:

[#104498] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/06/24

Sean O'Dell (sean@celsoft.com) wrote:

[#104499] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "rolo" <rohitlodha@...> 2004/06/25

> Sean O'Dell (sean@celsoft.com) wrote:

[#104500] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/25

On Thursday 24 June 2004 17:23, rolo wrote:

[#104526] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/25

>>>>> "S" == Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com> writes:

[#104539] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/25

On Friday 25 June 2004 02:19, ts wrote:

[#104542] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/06/25

[#104587] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/25

On Friday 25 June 2004 08:57, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#104636] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/26

>>>>> "S" == Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com> writes:

[#104646] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/26

On Saturday 26 June 2004 04:19, ts wrote:

[#104663] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/27

>>>>> "S" == Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com> writes:

[#104694] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday 27 June 2004 01:41, ts wrote:

[#104699] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/27

I think that #become and #class= are _theoretically_ wrong. Such a

[#104700] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday 27 June 2004 13:44, Patrick May wrote:

[#104701] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday, June 27, 2004, at 05:20 PM, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#104706] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday 27 June 2004 14:48, Patrick May wrote:

[#104710] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/27

Sean,

[#104712] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday 27 June 2004 15:43, Patrick May wrote:

[#104714] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/27

[#104715] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Sunday 27 June 2004 16:53, Patrick May wrote:

[#104716] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/28

[#104724] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Sunday 27 June 2004 17:30, Patrick May wrote:

[#104754] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/28

Sean,

[#104763] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Monday 28 June 2004 05:45, Patrick May wrote:

[#104764] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Mikael Brockman <phubuh@...> 2004/06/28

"Sean O'Dell" <sean@celsoft.com> writes:

[#104766] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Monday 28 June 2004 08:33, Mikael Brockman wrote:

[#104767] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/06/28

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:58:22 +0900, Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com> wrote:

[#104769] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Monday 28 June 2004 09:27, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#104787] Re: [OT] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2004/06/28

Hi,

[#104533] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Scott Rubin <srubin@...> 2004/06/25

I can't possibly imagine it being useful to do this except when the

[#104535] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2004/06/25

[#104501] Building Ruby on AIX -- again — Matt Lawrence <matt@...>

I finally have a stable system to use to try to build Ruby. Here's the

18 messages 2004/06/25
[#104510] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again — nobu.nokada@... 2004/06/25

Hi,

[#104511] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again — Matt Lawrence <matt@...> 2004/06/25

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#104512] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again — nobu.nokada@... 2004/06/25

Hi,

[#104513] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again — Matt Lawrence <matt@...> 2004/06/25

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#104601] OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

14 messages 2004/06/25

[#104637] SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs" — Meino Christian Cramer <Meino.Cramer@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/06/26

[#104649] Writing UNIX 'wc' program — "@*(&SPAM&)*optonline.net" <" kboruff\""@*.*optonline.net>

Hey all,

13 messages 2004/06/27

[#104737] (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi gurus and nubys,

16 messages 2004/06/28

[#104864] arrayfields-3.0.0 — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

URLS:

16 messages 2004/06/29

Re: [BUG?] Seqfault sorting array of Files by ctime

From: "Robert McGovern" <robertm@...>
Date: 2004-06-14 12:28:27 UTC
List: ruby-talk #103486
Just to follow up on myself.

The problem described below (i.e ruby segfaulting when running test.rb) has disappeared since I have updated from Cygwin dll version 1.5.9-1 to 1.5.10-3. Indeed I now have a test directory of 79 sub directories and test.rb works every time.

Just realised I had missed out the exclamation mark from my sort command in the examples, doh!

Rob

>>> rob@tarasis.net 05/28/04 02:00pm >>>
(repost of a message sent to ML as it appears to have not made it to
Newsgroup land)

Don't understand why the following segfaults under Cygwin when you
have a
directory of 21 (or more) entries (see example below)

$ cat test.rb
dirs = Dir.glob("*/")
dirs.sort { | x, y | File.new(x).ctime <=> File.new(y).ctime }
dirs.each { | x | puts x + " " + File.new(x).ctime.to_s }

but the following doesn't

$ cat test2.rb
dirs = Dir.glob("*/")
dirs.sort { | x, y | File.ctime(x) <=> File.ctime(y) }
dirs.each { | x | puts x + " " + File.ctime(x).to_s }

Also, why does test.rb produce the following using a native windows
compile.

C:\DEVELO~1\cygwin\home\robertm\test>ruby test.rb
test.rb:2:in `initialize': Permission denied - a/ (Errno::EACCES)
        from test.rb:2:in `new'
        from test.rb:2
        from test.rb:2:in `sort'
        from test.rb:2

I tried to capture a back trace but when I ran it through gdb it ran
perfectly.

Some further testing shows that test.rb works fine on Linux (Redhat
6.2 with 1.8.2 stable snapshot 2004-05-24 [i686-linux], unable to
build ruby 1.9.0 at the minute as autoconf to old)

Rob

--------------running test.rb in cygwin-------------------------

$ ruby test.rb 
a/ Wed May 26 11:08:00 GMT0:00 2004
b/ Wed May 26 11:08:02 GMT0:00 2004
c/ Wed May 26 11:08:03 GMT0:00 2004
d/ Wed May 26 11:08:04 GMT0:00 2004
e/ Wed May 26 11:08:05 GMT0:00 2004
f/ Wed May 26 11:08:07 GMT0:00 2004
g/ Wed May 26 11:08:22 GMT0:00 2004
h/ Wed May 26 11:08:24 GMT0:00 2004
i/ Wed May 26 11:10:37 GMT0:00 2004
j/ Wed May 26 11:10:42 GMT0:00 2004
k/ Wed May 26 11:10:47 GMT0:00 2004
m/ Wed May 26 11:11:17 GMT0:00 2004
n/ Wed May 26 11:11:20 GMT0:00 2004
o/ Wed May 26 11:11:24 GMT0:00 2004
p/ Wed May 26 11:11:29 GMT0:00 2004
test.rb:3: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.0 (2004-05-26) [i386-cygwin]

----------------running test2.rb in cygwin-------------------------

robertm@PC126 ~/test
$ ruby test2.rb 
a/ Wed May 26 11:08:00 GMT0:00 2004
b/ Wed May 26 11:08:02 GMT0:00 2004
c/ Wed May 26 11:08:03 GMT0:00 2004
d/ Wed May 26 11:08:04 GMT0:00 2004
e/ Wed May 26 11:08:05 GMT0:00 2004
f/ Wed May 26 11:08:07 GMT0:00 2004
g/ Wed May 26 11:08:22 GMT0:00 2004
h/ Wed May 26 11:08:24 GMT0:00 2004
i/ Wed May 26 11:10:37 GMT0:00 2004
j/ Wed May 26 11:10:42 GMT0:00 2004
k/ Wed May 26 11:10:47 GMT0:00 2004
m/ Wed May 26 11:11:17 GMT0:00 2004
n/ Wed May 26 11:11:20 GMT0:00 2004
o/ Wed May 26 11:11:24 GMT0:00 2004
p/ Wed May 26 11:11:29 GMT0:00 2004
q/ Wed May 26 11:11:35 GMT0:00 2004
r/ Wed May 26 11:11:40 GMT0:00 2004
s/ Wed May 26 11:11:44 GMT0:00 2004
t/ Wed May 26 11:11:48 GMT0:00 2004
u/ Wed May 26 11:11:53 GMT0:00 2004
v/ Wed May 26 11:11:57 GMT0:00 2004

---------------Contents of ruby.exe.stackdump------------------

$ less ruby.exe.stackdump

Stack trace:
Frame     Function  Args
02409D28  77E7AC21  (00000000, F0C43524, 0240F098, 77E94809)
02409E28  6108A370  (000014C8, 02409E40, 02409E58, 610E8D26)
02409EE8  6108A64A  (000014C8, 00000006, 02409F18, 6108AA1D)
02409EF8  6108A46C  (00000006, 00000400, 02409F28, 0240A364)
02409F18  6108AA1D  (61115378, 100102D9, 1009A4E0, 1009A4E6)
0240A358  610882AF  (10085A02, 0240F140, 0240A398, 61027459)
0240A368  10085A32  (0000000B, 000000A4, 0240F098, 77E94809)
0240A398  61027459  (000004E8, 0000EA60, 000000A4, 0240A3D4)
0240A4A8  6108D282  (0240F098, 610252CD, 0240A990, 00000000)
0240A8A8  61025327  (0240A990, 0240F098, 0240A9AC, 0240A968)
0240A8CC  77FB172E  (0240A990, 0240F098, 0240A9AC, 0240A968)
0240A978  77FB1700  (00000000, 0240A9AC, 0240A990, 0240A9AC)
0240AC78  77F75DBA  (00000000, 00000000, 0240ACB8, 6101E154)
0240AC88  610317F4  (00000000, 006F0068, 0065006D, 0072005C)
0240ACB8  6101E154  (0240ACD0, 00000000, 00000000, 00000000)
0240B028  6101DEB8  (10148ED8, 00000000, 00000001, 00000000)
End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present)

----------------Attempt to get stack trace------------------

$ gdb ruby
GNU gdb 2003-09-20-cvs (cygwin-special)
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.

Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
details.
This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"...
(gdb) run test.rb
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/ruby.exe test.rb
a/ Wed May 26 11:08:00 GMT0:00 2004
b/ Wed May 26 11:08:02 GMT0:00 2004
c/ Wed May 26 11:08:03 GMT0:00 2004
d/ Wed May 26 11:08:04 GMT0:00 2004
e/ Wed May 26 11:08:05 GMT0:00 2004
f/ Wed May 26 11:08:07 GMT0:00 2004
g/ Wed May 26 11:08:22 GMT0:00 2004
h/ Wed May 26 11:08:24 GMT0:00 2004
i/ Wed May 26 11:10:37 GMT0:00 2004
j/ Wed May 26 11:10:42 GMT0:00 2004
k/ Wed May 26 11:10:47 GMT0:00 2004
m/ Wed May 26 11:11:17 GMT0:00 2004
n/ Wed May 26 11:11:20 GMT0:00 2004
o/ Wed May 26 11:11:24 GMT0:00 2004
p/ Wed May 26 11:11:29 GMT0:00 2004
q/ Wed May 26 11:11:35 GMT0:00 2004
r/ Wed May 26 11:11:40 GMT0:00 2004
s/ Wed May 26 11:11:44 GMT0:00 2004
t/ Wed May 26 11:11:48 GMT0:00 2004
u/ Wed May 26 11:11:53 GMT0:00 2004
v/ Wed May 26 11:11:57 GMT0:00 2004

Program exited normally.
(gdb)



In This Thread

Prev Next